share
6-minute read
In this article:
A couple of years back, my phone rang. It was from a developer I’d never met. A colleague had passed on our number. He didn’t want small talk. This was his situation…
He had a duplex site to settle in under two weeks. His bank wanted another four just to review the file.
Do the maths. That’s a deposit gone. Maybe the whole project.
(I’ve changed the details to keep him anonymous. But if you’ve been developing for more than a couple of years, you’ve lived some version of this.)
That call is why I’ve written this article. Settlement risk isn’t just some line on a spreadsheet. It’s a Tuesday afternoon phone call, shouting, ‘Warning! Project under threat.’ More than enough to ruin your week.
Here’s what happened.
His development application was a simple complying one. It should have taken four weeks. It had blown out to eleven, with no answer in sight. Meanwhile, the long settlement period he’d fought hard to negotiate was evaporating.
The original plan was clean: get approvals, then roll straight into construction funding. That plan was dead. He now needed acquisition finance to buy the land first, save his deposit and save the development.
Then the vendor served a formal notice to complete. 14 days. Settle or lose it. The bank couldn’t move in 14 days. So he called me.
It rarely arrives as one big disaster. It’s a stack of small delays landing at the same time, usually right at the start of a project:
ASIC’s MoneySmart glossary describes bridging finance as a loan that covers the gap between one transaction and the next. Accurate. Also a bit dry.
What it doesn’t tell you is that the gap always seems to show up at the worst possible moment.
Talk to enough developers, and you’ll hear that same sentiment.
And it’s showing up more often. Construction delays and a run of builder insolvencies have made project timing harder to predict, something credit and finance industry bodies have been flagging for a while now.
Let me be fair to the bank.
They did nothing wrong. Four weeks to get a file through credit and order a valuation is normal for them.
But that’s exactly the problem. A bank’s “normal” and a developer’s “normal” run on two different clocks. One counts in months. The other counts in days, with a notice to complete ticking.
Banks are built for predictable lending. Clean deals. Standard timelines. Hand them messy title structures, vendor finance arrangements or 14 days instead of three months, and the honest answer is they can’t move fast enough. Even when they want to. It’s not a lack of goodwill. The machine just wasn’t built for this.
This is where the story turns. We took the file to a private lender in our network who does exactly this kind of short-term, settlement-driven deal.
No credit committee queue. No month of due diligence. They assessed the security and had terms back within 24 hours. 24 hours versus four weeks.
Non-bank and private lenders don’t run the bank’s process, so they can:
Here’s bridging finance for developers in one line: it moves at the speed your project needs, not the speed a standard credit process allows. Read that again.
Bridging finance isn’t cheap. It costs more than a bank facility. It should. You’re paying for speed and a flexibility banks can’t offer. It’s also short-term by design. So it only works when a clear, realistic exit is already in sight, whether that’s a refinance into construction funding, a sale or the next stage of funding landing.
Structure it badly, and a bridging loan creates the very settlement risk it was meant to fix. That’s not a finance problem. It’s a who’s-structuring-it problem.
He settled with days to spare on the notice to complete. We negotiated a six-month term and pushed hard for a three-month minimum interest period. That way, if he refinanced early, he wasn’t paying for months he didn’t use. He then locked in his approvals and build contract, and refinanced into a flexible non-bank construction facility:
Deposit saved. Project built. And he’s still a client today.
That’s the job, really. Zolve Australia is a commercial broker. We exist to connect developers with the right non-bank or private lender before a manageable delay turns into a genuine crisis.
Four things make it work:
Every lender on our platform is independent. There’s no upfront fee to have the conversation.
See how the process works on our How It Works page.
Here’s the pattern I keep seeing. Most developers don’t call when the problem starts. They call a week or two before a deadline, when the options have already shrunk. Don’t wait for that.
If a settlement date is closing in, or your bank has just said, “We need another six weeks”, talk to someone now. Not next week.
Check our FAQ for the questions we get asked most, or get in touch and tell us where things actually stand. That’s usually the most useful conversation anyway.
Dale Wilkinson is Co-Founder & Director of Zolve Australia, a commercial broker specialising in non-bank and private lending for property developers and investors.
